Propery Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Propery Law - Case Study Example Mr. Jackson bought the property without even seeing it before payment was made. He relied entirely on Alex and Rogers Co. to advise him on his purchase from Damian Brown and the internet sales photographs and details of the property. Alex completed the transaction on his behalf over the summer. While Alex and Mr. Anderson were out in their office, Mr. Jackson went to their office and made a complaint over the property he bought. The secretary of Mr.Anderson wrote down the following complaints of Mr.Jackson. He is horrified to find several serious problems at the property of which he was totally unaware until now:- Jeremy Smith (son of new neighbour Mrs Smith) seems to have taken over 5 acres of the land belonging to Glebe House (and now to Mr Jackson) and is treating it as it as his own. He says he has done so for years and has no intention of stopping. Mrs Smith is complaining about the fact that Mr Jackson has applied for planning permission to change Glebe House into a conference centre and says that it is in breach of a covenant entered into several years ago between her father and Mr Brown whereby Glebe house and land were transferred on condition that there would be no business use on the property. A note was pushed through the letter box at Glebe House from a "Cheryl Armitage" claiming to be Damion Brown's fiance and wanting the return of her "investment" in Glebe House forthwith. She is contacting her solicitor. Valuable items have been taken from the property ( presumably by the seller) including: -Valuable artwork depicting the history of Glebe house -A set of garden statues -Kitchen display wall cabinets forming part of the fitted Kitchen 1) What are the rights of Mr. Anderson over the property 2) What are the liabilities, if any, of Alex and Mr. Anderson in this case 3) What are the effects of the covenant between Mrs. Smith's father and Mr. Damian Brown and the claim of Mr. Brown's fiance over the rights of Mr. Anderson over the property Answer: For us to give an answer to the issues of the question, let us first take an overview of the property law in the United Kingdom where the facts of the question arose. The right to property One of the fundamental rights afforded for the citizens of the United Kingdom is the property right which can be defined as the right to own, possess, use, enjoy, and dispose property. The term property includes but is not limited to movable properties such as cars and clothing, and immovable properties such as lands, land and buildings or land and house. Though fundamental by nature, the right to property is only a statutory right, which means that the exercise of this right is subject to existing laws of the State where this right is provided. The exercise of this right was mostly based from common law jurisdictions that were prevalent during the ancient times at the United Kingdom. Though statutory laws are now in effect, common law are still useful most especially in property issues where no statutory bases are readily available just like purchase of property through the internet. Relevant to this right is the purchase of real property. Purchase or "buying", is a traditional way of owing a real property such as land or house. When a person purchases or buys a property, he is given the absolute right or title

Context and Truth Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Context and Truth - Essay Example It's also the interconnected circumstances in which something exists or happens. It has a major role to play in the sense that it can be as powerful as completely changing the meaning of the said or written to something totally opposite of what the original had been. Context can be categorized into several demographic classes; be it social or political. The thought is that context influences the means we comprehend the term. The truth in its actual meanings is the level of meaningfulness, fact relation, confirmation and level of sincerity. Wherever the 'truth' comes in, the result is either one will staunchly agree to it and will consider it a sin to question or challenge its credibility. But with the evident of the truth, there is also uproar by those who are doubtful about its existence. Either they completely reject the truth or they begin look for answers which makes them believe in that truth. A lot people argue on the truthfulness of something. What actually they are doing is that they are trying to match their desired answers with the ones they already have. This is merely in pursuit of getting ones' self correct in front of others. After all its human nature that one finds it difficult to accept failure. So to maintain one's self respect, to continue to feed one's ego and to fulfill the urge of being superior to others makes one argue on the truthfulness of something. Thus in this case the truth turns out to be something overloaded with certain facts that might have been related to the topic by someone in such a technical way that it looks as the truth in front of the claims placed by others (Taylor, 1998). This is a good way engineering any sort of communication to benefit ones' self and create a wining situation against the competing claims of anyone else. But during this competing what happens is that either the truth becomes distorted or it completely loses its originality. You can understand it by this that consider the truth to an elephant and you ask seven blind men, to touch and feel the elephant and then describe what an elephant looks like. The result will be that each of the seven blind men will think that only he knows what an elephant looks like and thus, only he knows what the truth is. To justify the existence of truth, another approach may be of finding out the best possible answer(s)! Many people will agree on this point. The fact, that though a lot of people know that what is the truth and are having its full availability and awareness. But still these people are in a constant search of truth, is based on the concept of finding what is best. People are in constant search of truth because knowing the truth about life, this world or this universe can give them satisfaction. It can help them in understanding themselves better. Its can help people become productive. It can help us to solve problems that we face in every phase of our life. Extending on the saying "survival of the fittest", the rule is very much applicable to the "Truth" as well. The truth therefore may be also based on an entity's nature, a certain phenomena or even someone else's experiences. This yields truth to be subjective to different aspects. However, this is not the actual case. The truth of any n' every thing is its correctness which can neither be judged by mere proofs nor can be measured on some scale. It is not the truth that